Nicknames: workplace banter or discrimination?

Mon 27th Jun 2016

Even affectionate nicknames can be classed as discrimination, as one company recently found out at great cost. Philip Sayers examines an age discrimination case and comments on what the business could have done differently.

“Employment tribunals that focus on potential discrimination cases are not unusual, but one recent example really caught my eye. A jewellery company lost an age discrimination case, in which a former long-standing member of its sales team was awarded £63,000. The employee who won the case had a nickname at work: his colleagues called him ‘Gramps’. In addition, when he turned 60 his key sales accounts were given to the head of sales and there were also reports that some of the firm’s customers described him as ‘old fashioned’, ‘long in the tooth’ or having a ‘traditional approach’, which did not fit with their business needs.

“The tribunal overturned the company’s argument that the nickname was not intended to be hurtful, but was just well-meaning workplace banter. The tribunal also said that the comments from customers, which contributed to the employee’s dismissal, were based on ageist attitudes.

“This case demonstrates the importance of keeping an eye on nicknames and checking whether or not they are linked to any of the protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010, which include (among others) gender, sexual orientation and race as well as age. Although this employee did not make a formal complaint about the nickname prior to the hearing, the business should have spotted it and dealt with it.

“Another useful learning for employers is to think about how this business could have approached things differently to avoid the problem. If the staff member was in fact not keeping up, or was out of step with customer’s needs, then this should have been addressed through performance management and possible training. A paper trail showing what the business did to manage the situation would have made all the difference.

“This was undoubtedly a difficult situation, but if the company had nipped the problem in the bud I’m sure this outcome could have been avoided.”

For more information on this or any Employment enquiries contact Philip Sayers on 0800 328 3282 or email info@coodes.co.uk

Mon 27th Jun 2016

Related Services & sectors

Search News & Events

Popular

Pattern

Changes to Paternity Leave in April 2024: What do you need to know?

As of 6th April 2024, paternity leave will be changing to reflect a shifting attitude…

Read more

Pattern

Suspecting a Power of Attorney of financial abuse: what can you do?

What steps should you take if you suspect someone is committing financial abuse as a…

Read more

Portfolio Builder

Select the legal expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)